IPR

law image01 free img

BANK OF BARODA VS ABAN OFFSHORE LTD, (29.01.2020 – NCLAT): MANU/NL/0067/2020

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Bank of Baroda vs. Aban Offshore Limited  CITATION (29.01.2020-NCLAT): MANU/NL/0067/2020 COURT National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi PETITIONER Bank of Baroda  RESPONDENTS Aban Offshore Limited  DECIDED ON 29 January, 2020 INTRODUCTION The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) discussed the important issue of the rights of preference shareholders under the Companies Act, […]

BANK OF BARODA VS ABAN OFFSHORE LTD, (29.01.2020 – NCLAT): MANU/NL/0067/2020 Read More »

expertise bg

SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. VS. HONG YI F35 AND OTHERS, 2024 SCC ONLINE DEL 7310

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Sporta Technologies v. Hong Y1 F35 CITATION 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7310 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. RESPONDENTS Hong Yi F35 And Others DECIDED ON 16 October, 2024 INTRODUCTION The case presents important matters of trademark infringement, passing off and copyright infringement in the online fantasy sports market. The

SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. VS. HONG YI F35 AND OTHERS, 2024 SCC ONLINE DEL 7310 Read More »

brown concrete pillar indoor 150x150.jpg

DR. RAJESH KUMAR YADUVANSHI VS SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, AIRONLINE 2020 DEL 1298

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Dr. Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office (Sfio) & Anr. CITATION AIRONLINE 2020 DEL 1298 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER Dr. Rajesh Kumar Yaduvanshi  RESPONDENTS Serious Fraud Investigation Office (Sfio) & Anr. DECIDED ON 21 September, 2020 INTRODUCTION The High Court decision of the Delhi High Court delivered on September 21,

DR. RAJESH KUMAR YADUVANSHI VS SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE, AIRONLINE 2020 DEL 1298 Read More »

expertise bg

RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED V. MD. SIRAJUDDIN AND BEAUTY BIBI, 2024 SCC ONLINE BOM 3549

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Reliance Retail Ltd. v. Md. Sirajuddin and Beauty Bibi CITATION 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3549 COURT Bombay High Court PETITIONER Reliance Retail Ltd.  RESPONDENTS Md. Sirajuddin and Beauty Bibi DECIDED ON 24 October, 2024 INTRODUCTION The case of Reliance Retail Limited v. Md. Sirajuddin and Beauty Bibi raises significant issues of trademark infringement

RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED V. MD. SIRAJUDDIN AND BEAUTY BIBI, 2024 SCC ONLINE BOM 3549 Read More »

law image01 free img 150x150.jpg

DR. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY V. MEDICINE ME & ORS. 2024 SCC ONLINE DEL 8565

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Devi Prasad Shetty v. Medicine Me CITATION 2024 SCC OnLine Del 8565 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER Devi Prasad Shetty RESPONDENTS Medicine Me DECIDED ON 28 November, 2024 INTRODUCTION The case featured Dr. Devi Prasad Shetty v. Medicine Me & Ors. is important, it deals with significant concerns regarding the violation of personality

DR. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY V. MEDICINE ME & ORS. 2024 SCC ONLINE DEL 8565 Read More »

hero bg 1024x683.jpg

PACIFIC CONVERGENCE CORP LTD. V. DATA ACCESS (INDIA) LTD. (2024) 3 HCC (Del) 766

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Pacific Convergence Corpn. Ltd. v. Data Access (India) Ltd. CITATION (2024) 3 HCC (Del) 766 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER Pacific Convergence Corpn. Ltd.  RESPONDENTS Data Access (India) Ltd. DECIDED ON 5 July, 2024 INTRODUCTION Pacific Convergence Corp Ltd. v. Data Access (India) Ltd. raises important legal issues surrounding corporate liquidation, property rights

PACIFIC CONVERGENCE CORP LTD. V. DATA ACCESS (INDIA) LTD. (2024) 3 HCC (Del) 766 Read More »

Scrabble tiles spelling 'LAW' on a wooden table, symbolizing connections to education and legality.

E & M SPECIALTY CO.INC VS MR. ANIL WAHAL (DIRECTOR) (2024) 2 HCC (Del) 407

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME E&M Specialty Co. Inc. v. Anil Wahal (Director) CITATION (2024) 2 HCC (Del) 407 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER E&M Specialty Co. Inc. RESPONDENTS Anil Wahal DECIDED ON 7 February, 2024 INTRODUCTION On February 7, 2024, the High Court of Delhi rendered a landmark decision in the matter of E & M, Specialty

E & M SPECIALTY CO.INC VS MR. ANIL WAHAL (DIRECTOR) (2024) 2 HCC (Del) 407 Read More »

From above of judicial symbols consisting of Scales of Justice and small judge hammer with curly handle

HIND RECTIFIERS LTD. V. CHROME21 INDIA PVT. LTD. AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1652

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Hind Rectifiers Ltd. v. Chrome21 India Pvt. Ltd. CITATION 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3648 COURT Bombay High Court PETITIONER Hind Rectifiers Ltd. RESPONDENTS Chrome21 India Pvt. Ltd DECIDED ON 26 November 2024 INTRODUCTION The legal dispute in Hind Rectifiers Ltd. vs. Chrome21 India Pvt. Ltd. raises some serious issues about trademark infringement and

HIND RECTIFIERS LTD. V. CHROME21 INDIA PVT. LTD. AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1652 Read More »

hammer, books, law, dish, lawyer, paragraphs, regulation, court of justice, a book, §, code, law books, judge, order, rule, disposal, auction, law, law, law, law, law, lawyer, lawyer, lawyer

MOTI MAHAL DELUX MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD.  AND ORS. V. SRMJ BUSINESS PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. (12.12.2024 – DELHC):MANU/DE/8917/2024

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME Moti Mahal Delux Management Services Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs. SRMJ Business Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.  CITATION (12.12.2024 – DELHC): MANU/DE/8917/2024 COURT Delhi High Court PETITIONER Moti Mahal Delux Management Services Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. RESPONDENTS SRMJ Business Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.  DECIDED ON 12 December, 2024 INTRODUCTION In Moti Mahal

MOTI MAHAL DELUX MANAGEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD.  AND ORS. V. SRMJ BUSINESS PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. (12.12.2024 – DELHC):MANU/DE/8917/2024 Read More »

lady justice, legal, law, justice, symbol, lawyer, balance, scale, attorney, law office, scales of justice lady, legal, legal, law, law, law, law, law, justice, lawyer, lawyer, lawyer

M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1652

Leave a Comment / IPR /

CASE NAME M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. vs. The State of Karnataka CITATION AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1652 COURT Supreme Court of India PETITIONER M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. RESPONDENTS The State of Karnataka DECIDED ON 3 December, 2019 INTRODUCTION On December 3, 2019 the  Supreme Court ruled in M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. vs. The

M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1652 Read More »

Request Appointment
Request Appointment

The website of Agarwal IP and Corporate Law Chamber aims to provide basic information about the chamber, which can also be found on various public platforms and social media. While they strive for accuracy and timeliness, they do not guarantee the information's completeness or its applicability to specific situations. Users are encouraged to verify the information from other sources.

This website is not meant for advertising or client solicitation, nor does it establish a lawyer-client relationship. The links provided are for accessing information about Agarwal IP and Corporate Law Chamber and its thought leadership initiatives. The content should not be considered legal advice or a legal reference. Users are advised to consult legal professionals in their respective jurisdictions for accurate information and guidance.

Agarwal IP and Corporate Law Chamber advises against sharing confidential, business, or politically sensitive information through the communication platform on their website. Users are responsible for their own judgment when exchanging such information.

Agree Decline